Home arrow Health arrow hnews arrow Secondhand smoke at workplace increases lung cancer risk Monday, 12 May 2008
 
 
   
Google
 
 
HomeWorldFinanceSci/TechHealthEntertainmentSportsContact Us

Secondhand smoke at workplace increases lung cancer risk Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Wists
YahooMyWeb
Blinkbits
BlinkList
blogmarks
co.mments
connotea
Digg
Stumble
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Written by Theresa Maher   
Wednesday, 28 February 2007

If your co-workers love smoking at the workplace, you better be careful for a new study says that secondhand smoke at the workplace doubles the risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers.

Those who inhale secondhand smoke or in other words indulge in passive smoking are at a 50 percent increased risk of developing lung cancer. The study reviewed 22 previous research initiatives on secondhand smoke in the US, Canada, Europe, India, Japan and China.

Inhaling the smoke of other people is called passive, involuntary or secondhand smoking. The non-smoker breathes the so-called "sidestream" smoke, which is leftover after the smoker has inhaled from the burnt tobacco.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified environmental tobacco smoke as a known human cancer-causing agent.

The current study only reinforces this finding. Researchers led by Leslie Stayner of the University of Illinois at Chicago say that the risk of a nonsmoker developing lung cancer increases by 100 percent if he/she is exposed to large amounts of secondhand smoke at the workplace.

"We believe that our study provides the strongest evidence to date that smoking in the workplace does present a substantial risk to workers -- and particularly to workers who are working in highly exposed areas such as bar workers or restaurant workers," Stayner said.

Passive smoking causes some immediate effects like eye irritation, headache, cough, sore throat, dizziness and nausea. Non-smokers exposed to second-hand smoke have a 30 percent increased risk of heart disease and a 20 percent to 30 percent increased risk for lung cancer.

Writing in the American Journal of Public Health, the researchers observed that nonsmokers exposed to secondhand smoke at the job had a 50 percent increased risk of lung cancer as compared to those not exposed to the smoke.

Furthermore the study found that nonsmokers exposed to any kind of secondhand smoke had a 24 percent increased risk of developing lung cancer.

Most corporate workplaces do have limits on smoking. But people like waiters and waitresses in bars and restaurants that permit smoking are at high risk for developing smoke-related illnesses.

The best example is that of Heather Crowe, a Canadian woman who died of lung cancer in May 2006. A nonsmoker, Ms Crowe worked in restaurants and the inhaled secondhand smoke caused lung cancer leading to her death.

That is why in the US Surgeon General Richard Carmona had called for a ban on public smoking in a hard-hitting report last year. "The science is clear. Secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance but a serious health hazard," Surgeon General Richard Carmona had said. "The debate is over."

Other countries are taking the lead in banning smoking from public places. Starting this week smoking is banned in offices, stores, schools and hospitals in France.

It is estimated that banning smoking in all workplaces in the United States would prevent 1,500 heart attacks and 360 strokes, and would save $49 million. in direct medical costs. Around 14 states have banned smoking in workplaces, restaurants or bars since 1994. And 2,000 local governments also restrict smoking in public places.


Add as favourites (80)

Comments (1)
RSS comments
1. 02-03-2007 17:18
Passive Smoking
I am the leader of Freedom to Choose in the UK. We are a pro choice organisation made up of both smokers and non smokers. I have researched Passive Smoking/ETS for over 3 years and to say I am staggered by this article is an understatement. I have seen the research by Professor Stayner and not even the press release of the research makes such a claim. If true non smokers would be dropping like flies. The 22 studies reviewed have been reviewed on a number of occasions and his conclusions are not dissimilar to all the others. Using meta-analysis he has concluded a 24% increased risk. The reason it is stated in this way is to mislead the public. Most would consider 24% to be almost one in 4 which it isn't 50% would be misconstrued as 1 in 2, which it also isn't. These studies were done using epidemiology where Relative Risk(RR) is the measure. 24% is a RR of 1.24. In scientific terms any risk containing a 1 as in this case is deemed to not be a significant risk. 2 is considered to be potentially due to some other confounding factors. In order to show causation the RR has to be 3 or in percentage terms 300% above the norm. I have written to Professor Stayner who now refuses to answer my queries but did confirm that this is far from new research it was conducted in 2003 when he was a visiting Professor at the IARC, the research wing of the WHO in Europe. This is yet another example of the anti smoking lobby re issuing 'research' in different forms. These studies are sponsored from money given to the WHO by the Drug companies on condition that smoking cessation products is advertised as the solution to smoking, when in reality they only have a less than 10% success rate. Passive Smoking is an irritant and doesn't kill anyone, the WHO's own 10 year study published in 1998 said so. This study by Professor Boffita was initially buried by the WHO.
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it (Guest)

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
BBCode:Web AddressEmail AddressBold TextItalic TextUnderlined TextQuoteCodeOpen ListList ItemClose List
Comment:



Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.4

 
< Prev   Next >

IMA Endorses Pepsi Products as...
The apex body of doctors instead of endorsing products in re...
More...

UK halves visa period for non-...
UK, EU or USA, Canada, Australia-NZ, all have double standar...
More...

Google Translate Goes Desi
nice
More...

Is Your Computer Keyboard Bett...
Man & Machine manufacturers a variety of keyboards and mice ...
More...

More About Lip Balm, Lip Gloss...
Lip gloss and cancer
More...

Syndicate Us
feed image
feed image
feed image
feed image
feed image
feed image
 
About Us | Privacy Policy | Advertise | Contact Us
Links: eMRSA | Know HGH
©2007-2008 NewsLocale.org, All Rights Reserved